App Quality Dashboard

Best Arms Fitness

0.4 / 5

Chhi Score

This app is performing

Poor

High Risk

/5

High Risk

/5

Good 

/5

Medium Risk

/5

#

 

Category

Rank

  • Install time: Icon 41.10 Sec
  • Launch time: Icon 11.21 Sec
  • Application size: Icon 39.32 MB
  • Last tested on : 06/06/2017
  • Build ID
    :   v1.5.3
  • Chhi Score
    :   0.4
  • Change Rate
    :   -75 %

What to fix?

10 Risk(s) are due to App PSS in Memory exceeding the threshold. See how to optimize memory and remove 10 High Risk(s).

Fixing CPU risks could drastically improve Chhi Score. There are 9 CPU risks.

Your App CPU is now in a High Risk Zone. With a small investment into your testing you can improve your app quality better. Get more test coverage

Do not initialize objects that aren't necessary during launch times. Moving to singleton pattern helps

Your App Memory is now in a High Risk Zone. With a small investment into your testing you can improve your app quality better. Get more test coverage

Test more often so that you don't break the CPU handling further in your next builds. CPU Score is in danger zone. Heavy battery consumption expected.

9 Risk(s) are due to Threads in CPU exceeding the threshold.

1 Risk(s) are due to Data Sent/Received in Network exceeding the threshold.

Potential risk in Memory: Utilization has gone up by62.5% compared to build v1.5.2

Build v1.5.2 did better in Network . Spikes in Network contributed to score drop by 38.3%

The app's CPU score has improved by 25%

The app has a high performance risk for the phone manufacturer(s) OnePlus, Spice, Karbonn, Motorola, YU, Samsung, Coolpad. Check coverage report for more details.

Make sure your App's PSS isn't too high. Freeing objects that aren't needed would reduce chances of getting unexpectedly killed by Android system.

Consider re-merging the code from build v1.5.2, Memory score was 2.4

Consider re-merging the code from build v1.5.2, Network score was 4.7

10 tests need immediate attention. View performance graph.

7 Risk(s) are due to App Total in Memory exceeding the threshold.

The app's memory score is 0.9 due to high memory utilization. Needs to be fixed as priority.

The app took 11.21 seconds to load on Android OS version 6.0. Usually anything more than 3.2 seconds results in user drops. View details

Utilization of CPU is close to the threshold.

Optimize the app to render elements at 60 FPS for buttery smooth experience.

Follow simple UI hierarchy by reducing nested layouts to Relative layouts.

App makes 3542.77 KB of network requests. Moving this to a background thread will improve load speed. View details

Upload APKs with and without 3rd Party SDKs to monitor and optimize the impact of app performance

254 apps having similar CPU load have low Chhi Scores

Testability: Providing login / sign-up details could very well improve depth of bot clicks

Do not initialize objects that aren't necessary during launch times. Moving to singleton pattern helps

46.31 MB of App Dalvik utilized by activity air.com.KalromSystems.BestArmsFitness.AppEntry. View details

Printing logs on callbacks would make debugging easy for tests run in our platform

Network utilization on Motorola Moto E (2nd gen) exceeded 1024 KB, you might want to consider bringing it down

Your average App Dalvik usage surged by 10.01%, Your memory score is 0.9

Avoid wake-locks in background, using Batch and schedulers APIs such as GCM, Job schedulers could reduce wake-locks

Fix & Optimize launch time using Flatbuffers for storage and rendering performance.

Total Network data consumed was 3542.77KB in Motorola Moto E (2nd gen) , This indicates the app will take 10-15 seconds on 2G network and 8-9 seconds on 3G network to load! View details

Coverage: Android version coverage for reports will range between 5.1.1 to 7.1.2

Caching: Use LruCache for data caching to optimize memory usage

Fix Oncreate() if the launch time is exceeding more than 3.2 secs. Try deflating views and layouts to optimize.

There is high probability of identifying risks running the apps with conditions

Below 10 MB approach would increase app installs in crowded markets such as India, China and Russia!

Screen coverage

competition benchmark

This app is ranked #1331 in Health & Fitness

1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
back-to-top